5 Comments on Homocaust

  1. Tyler the Titan // June 15, 2016 at 1:09 am // Reply

    Great show Joe, thanks for explaining the mental illness of homoism, I’ve also heard theories that some kind of birth defect that restricts T, or the father didn’t have enough T, something of that effect… Either way it’s an aberration that’s destructive to nations and buttholes.


  2. Senatssekretär Freistaat Danzig // June 15, 2016 at 10:07 pm // Reply

    Reblogged this on behindertvertriebentessarzblog.


  3. Thanks for the least heard documentation. They force / form the world accomodate them ie normalise and make others ‘abnormal’

    Check out the Names of those who assisted in the rise to acceptance


  4. G4S is a British-Danish private security company that provides services and equipment to Israeli prisons, checkpoints, the Apartheid Wall and the Israeli police.


  5. RobertHBurt // June 28, 2016 at 10:12 am // Reply

    I’m not offended by what you’re saying. It’s ignorant, but I’m not offended. I expect you will be offended by this though, because your brain is so small. Will you even be able to get through it? It’s based on legitimate research. How many “Real Men” have the courage to accept the reality of this? All you can do is lash out.
    Is it possible that homosexuality is a valid, legitimate and desirable outcome of heterosexual reproduction in some cases, in some ways, in some circumstances? How remote a destination in logic or reason do we have to arrive at in order to find the answer to this question?
    Science has found that a significant proportion of male homosexual individuals have this issue decided for them before they are born, and the factor which determines this is that a male child is already present in the family environment into which the new baby will be born. I don’t think we have to go to a remote destination in logic or reason at all. The answer is right here.
    There is more to this than at first seems apparent, and we need to deal with this matter more fully, but we have to begin somewhere, and this is a good place to start. The fact itself is consistent with a number of compelling implications.
    The fact that homosexuality can be determined by a situation already existing in the fetus’s family means that homosexuality is at least in some cases contingent upon circumstance. This implies two additional possibilities: first, that other determinates are also likely to exist, and, second, that homosexuality is in some ways an adaptive strategy. This alone gives it biological validity.
    Reproduction is always about life. But many humans live meaningful lives without reproducing; therefore, life is not necessarily about reproduction.
    Some plants propagate without sex. Some single-celled microscopic animals reproduce by physically dividing themselves, and some other life forms also reproduce without sex. Even in some larger animal species where sex normally occurs, reproduction without sex is possible. Therefore reproduction is not exclusively corrolated with sex.
    It is more the case that sex is simply an instrument which some advanced organisms use in accomplishing reproduction. Moreover, among humans and throughout the biosphere, only a very few acts of sexual intercourse actually result in reproduction; most are engaged in without any intention whatsoever of bringing about new life. Therefore sex cannot reasonably be said to be exclusively concerned with reproduction. And this has got to mean that useful sexual activity –sex that is beneficial to our species– can occur even when it is not concerned with reproduction. This makes necessary the understanding that sex exists for more than one reason. Sex is not only about reproduction but serves many purposes.
    Our universe is characaterized not by uniformity but by the potential for infinite variation. The ability to make use of many possible choices greatly increases the chances of our survival as a species. The bodies and nervous systems of human males are configured in a way that makes possible, facilitates, and even rewards a relatively complete variety of male-with-male sexual actions.
    Homosexual behavior has been known to occur among social birds and in mammals, particularly sea mammals and primates. Zebras, baboons, dolphins, sheep, buffalo, ducks, foxes, elephants, horses, gorillas, moose, house cats, pigs, mice, rabbits, swans and lions, to name a few. Homosexuality is a type of action which numerous species have found useful. But no animal is more well suited to such action than human males are.
    These facts have to mean that the potentiality for homosexual activity among human males is one of the characteristics fundamental the nature of our species, and while a capability for homosexual behavior places us categorically among many other animal groups, the maximization, in humans, of this activity’s potentiality is one of the fundamental characteristics that places us above them.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: