Extreme leftist norms, values and taboos in sync with liberal modernity are the default mode of the mainstream mindset in the west. The 68ers put the red glasses on and never took them off, only to forget that their entire world turned single-coloured. By gaining control of the media and the administrative system, this “new class” of materialistic, hedonistic, “anti-racist” old 68ers became the co-operational front-runners for globalism and capitalism.
The liberal democratic world view has its roots in the Enlightenment, when liberalism’s quantitative model of individualization was implemented. Once rationalism was incorporated into not only eighteenth century philosophy and science but also political and social thought, the result was to mandate in the name of “reason” and “progress” the “liberation” of human beings from traditional and “irrational” social bonds and relationships, thereby launching the war of modernity on tradition, underpinned by the ideologies of individualism and liberalism.
The Enlightenment saw traditional institutions and manners (like family and church) as prejudiced and out-of-date, and instigated a “crusade” against them. Initially a peaceful crusade, but gradually more violent. The “Enlightened” were so caught up by the scientific nature of their own ideas that they were ready to use violence and terror to force society into their framework. This was taken to its extremities under communism which sacrificed entire peoples to reach the presupposed classless paradise. This Bolshevik strain is also persistent within liberalism, and millions of people have been sacrificed in the name of liberal democracy.
The unprecedented success of rationalism and liberal modernity in reducing complex natural phenomena to simple mathematical explanations would, of course, do much to launch the career of modern science; but this came at a high price. Besides reducing reality to a simple expanse of matter, “understood” in abstract mathematical terms that did little to enhance man’s knowledge of his world and, in some cases, further estranged him from it, this quantifying reductionism had the effect of relegating the qualitative features of the European life—all those things associated with culture and heritage—to a secondary order of significance.
The “New Left” continued the philosophy of the Enlightenment, only to facilitate a global one world order of coca-colonization. By figuratively viciously opposing global capitalism, they literally championed its cause.
Our men let this happen by swallowing the red pill, which made them develop horns and bitch-tits, only to adhere to the rainbow-world of the global market uncompromisingly, with clouded judgement as a result. The weed smoking, childish, fuck-the-world-mentality of the hippie pacifist who hates weapons and war and thinks he has the solution in crappy intellectual endeavours enabled this to happen. Nothing but a pacified useful idiot would chant anti-war slogans and champion global amalgamation into the very system that destroys nations.
With a complete lack of abstract and critical thought, leftist “humanists” are paradoxically enough the most anti-human, suicidal, genocidal and ungrateful maniacs in the world, destroying the cornerstones of western civilization.
They are falling apart
In the 18th century, the champions of liberal modernity had mobilized the New Science against their conservative foes and have since presented themselves as the political vanguard of the most advanced scientific ideas. Twentieth-century science, however, has proven to be far less amenable to liberal claims. All seem to contradict liberal notions of environmental primacy, natural “goodness,” the individualist nature of the social world, the irrelevance of race, or the plasticity and equality of human nature. Given liberalism’s vulnerability in this field, our critical assault on modernist values, revealing the social, hierarchical, genetic, and hence anti-liberal foundations of human life, is of uttermost importance.
In contrast to liberalism’s homogenized world of fractured cultures and peoples, nationalism stands for a heterogeneous world of homogenous peoples, each rooted in their own culture and soil – pursuing their own destiny according to their organic settings.
Undermining the liberal order by discrediting its underlying tenets and affirming those traditional European ideas supportive of the identities and communities it champions is the way forward. Aspiring for cultural hegemony taken as the “infrastructural” basis of both civil society and the state, starts at a local level. Look back to the feudal, medieval Europe which was a place where local groups and societies had significant autonomy, where local traditions, manners and solidarity could flourish, and where a network of different groups and rulers balanced each other.
WAKE UP and take back your country!